THERE IS BUT ONE WAY TO BEAT THE STOCK MARKET; THERE ARE MANY WAYS OF BEING BEATEN BY IT
By HENRY HOWARD HARPER [published in 1926]
It is admitted by the most sagacious financiers that the only sure way of making money trading in the stock market is to get in and out at opportune times, and to stay out most of the time. As against this there are numerous ways of losing money. Among these, one method in particular is quite popular among a class of traders who although too clever and conservative to buy stocks at “top” prices, have not the patience to wait for “bottom” prices.
When values begin to crumble after the top has been reached in a bull market there must be a set of “carriers,” or supports, onto which stocks can be dumped on the way down. The market does not collapse like a ten-story card house; it generally goes down gradually for a while, one or two flights at a time, and finds steadying props every now and then which sustain it for brief periods.
For instance, a certain stock paying $5 a share annually has been hoisted by degrees from $75 up to $150 a share. When it descends to $140 a few wise traders who have been impatiently waiting for a reaction will buy it because it looks cheap at $140 after having sold at $150; then at $130 another lot of traders who are a little wiser and more patient than the first lot buy it because it looks much cheaper than it did even at $140; and so on down it finds these temporary supports, until at length it gets back to $75, or perhaps lower, where it is accumulated by a few shrewd investors and bargain hunters whose attention has been attracted to the market by front page newspaper headlines announcing that the stock market is in a state of complete prostration.
They go on about their business and pay no particular attention to the market until the price has recovered to a point where the stock, returning $5 a share, is no longer “paying its board,” when they sell out at a good profit, and stay out while the speculators carry it on up as far as they like. When the stock was at the bottom price those who bought it on a scale from $140 down were either so overloaded or pessimistic—probably both—that they were unable to buy more and thus reduce their average to a reasonable cost.
